home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: jet.uk!usenet
- From: Frithiof.Jensen@jet.uk (Frithiof Jensen)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc,comp.programming
- Subject: Re: Which is better?
- Date: 8 Jan 1996 17:15:17 GMT
- Organization: JET Joint Undertaking
- Message-ID: <4crjf5$ika@postman.jet.uk>
- References: <4bk4de$qcr$1@mhafn.production.compuserve.com> <860@sapphire.win-uk.net> <4cgefn$hjd@info-server.surrey.ac.uk> <pope-0501960921280001@pope.edunet.dk>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: pc_0020afbf8f16.jet.uk
- X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.6+
-
- In article <pope-0501960921280001@pope.edunet.dk>, pope@edunet.dk (Povl H. Pedersen) says:
- >
-
- >Youi can also get a good well supported product like CodeWarrior. Runs
- >only on the Mac, but comes complete with MFC 3.0. Updates every 4 months.
- >Will produce code for Mac 68k, Mac PowerPC, BeBox and Win32.
- >
- >The compiler is faster than almost anything under Windows.
- >
- >For Win16 you still need another compiler though.
-
- Or get VisualAge C++ for OS/2. Apart from being an excellent piece of
- software, the support is immensely better than Borlands: IBM has buglists,
- fixes, workarounds and patches available for free.
-
- All Borland has done to me lately is to insist that I upgrade, refusing to
- confirm or deny whether my problem is caused by a bug or not and that even
- after asking for my credit card details - some cheek hrmpf!!
-
- frithiof jensen.
-
-
- ===============================================================================
- The above article is the personal view of the poster and should not be
- considered as an official comment from the JET Joint Undertaking
- ===============================================================================
-